The MGS Blog

Tuesday, March 5, 2024

Editing audio for a podcast

Audacity 3 (https://www.audacityteam.org)

Audacity is a DAW, a Digital Audio Workstation. Audacity is also an open source project. It is a highly regarded and extremely capable software environment for sound engineering. Edit your audio recording (in post) to tidy things up. If you have a good quality original recording then the Edit makes it better. If your original recording has issues, then the DAW may help you make corrections like: balance the volume of different voices, standardise the levels, reducing pauses, 'emms and ahhs', delete different takes, filler speech, background noises and any generally unnecessary audio. Audacity can also be used to record directly to the project if needed for voice over and bookend statements.

Audacity Effects may improve sound quality, audio clarity, apply new elements and create the finished file. You may applying effects like normalise or amplify, compressor, noise reduction, high pass, low pass, equalise, add stings, fades, and eventually, and then ultimately, export the finished project as a releasable mp3 file.



A screen shot of an Audacity project
A screen shot of an Audacity project

The screenshot above illustrates what waveform levels might look like for your recording. Above all else  trust your ears to judge the quality of a recording when you listen back to it.

Editing Audio for Podcasting with Audacity

Save Save Save - the Project file and folder

Everything lives in .aup3.
You are strongly advised NOT to work on your active project on an external USB stick/disk, networked storage or cloud storage as it is unlikely to be fast enough for satisfactory recording and editing. To avoid data loss save the project frequently. Make a local disk copy for project editing as Audacity generates very large sets of project edit/state files (online cloud drive services may not unpack or stage quickly enough to support Audacity's project edit/save cycle). To share an Audacity project with others you will need to share the project aup3 file. 
n.b. older versions of Audacity stored data in a project _data folder.  If you move to Audacity 3 there will no longer be a _data folder for each project (yay).

And save save save save frequently. 
And occasionally 'save' then 'close' the project window to force the project to compact safely. 
Reopen and continue working.

Importing audio

Create a new project and save to disk.
    File > Save Project > Save Project (cmd S)
Import previously recorded audio (an mp3 or wav file). 
    File > Import > Audio
Save
    cmd S 
An Audacity project with at least one audio track will resemble the screen shot above.
Play, pause and even record new audio to the current project. 
The playhead is the vertical line displayed over the waveform. All tracks will play through the audio device unless muted or one is soloed. The keyboard space bar toggles the play/pause function from the current playhead.
Once you start importing audio (particularly high quality poly WAV recordings), the Audacity project file (as of version 3 this will be the *.aup3 file) can become very large very quickly (anywhere from 3 GB to 36 GB). 

Multi-track, stereo, mono

A typical audio project file contains synchronised separate tracks representing each microphone or audio source. Usually edit the project configured with Tracks>Synch-lock "on" so that the separate audio tracks remain synched. A basic workflow for post-processing each track separately:
  • Loudness Normalisation (-20dB LUFS)
  • High Pass filter (6dB at 100Hz) 
  • De-Clicker
  • De-Esser
  • Noise cancellation (if needed)

Some useful editing techniques

Quick select, cut and paste

The Audacity toolbars, click and drag to rearrange or float

Choose the Selection Tool (F1) to edit your audio track directly. Click-drag to highlight parts of the audio waveform. Use the cursor to select the waveform to copy (cmd C), paste (cmd V), duplicate (cmd D) cut (cmd X) or delete (del, backspace or cmd K) along the timeline. The edit commands are also accessed via the menu.
    Edit > etc.

Automatically suppress background and soft sounds like breathing

Use Label Sounds to automatically search for and label silence (Audacity manual)





Select Silence and suppress e.g. Silence Audio or manually e.g. Select and Normalize -35dB


Multitrack 

    Tracks > Sync-Lock Tracks (on/off)
You can organise the structure of a recording by using new tracks for sections of audio (to organise the large scale edit).
As of Audacity 3 you can now grab the track label bar when the hand icon/tool appears. This is a really handy :-) approach for aligning track segments or to move a split selection from one track to another.
Toggle the Sync-Lock Tracks setting either synchronise (ON) edits across the tracks in parallel, or (OFF) move tracks relative to each other. This is useful if for example you want to overlap, reorder, or otherwise change the structure of the recordings, e.g. adjust fades, add transitions, change the order of speech.

Large scale edit

Your listeners want a well edited informative podcast so remember, less is more. You will have to listen (and re-listen) to your material and decide what to keep or delete. Think about the length and structure of the recording. You can change the order. You will delete stuff so do it. Concentrate on large chunks, the structure of the talk. Don’t worry about breathing, coughs and minor noises just yet. 

Small scale edit

After the large scale edit more or less done, spend time on the small scale edit. This involves zooming in and fine-grained cut and pasting. But think before acting, is it really necessary to remove every single intake of breath? 
For example: cut long gaps, background noises and any generally unnecessary audio. You might also cut some of the egregious 'emms and ahhs' and nervous filler speech we all use. A caution though, the small scale edit can become a journey without an end, or at least a very long journey.
Note: "Sometimes you will not want to close the gap and yet still remove the noise, for instance if somebody breathes loudly. For such occasions copy a section of audio during which nobody is speaking (e.g. at the start of the recording) and paste it over the unwanted noise. This will preserve the natural pacing of speech." (source: Cook & Holdis, CEU Podcast Library - link)

Fade-in Fade-out

Apply fade-in and fade-out when you want the speech to start or end smoothly.


A useful Audacity EQ setting

Post-processing - Loudness Normalization 

Start out by applying loudness normalization (default -23 LUFS) separately to each track - why separately? Each track has its own average. I think normalising across all tracks at the same time biases the average gain to the loudest track's level. The same thing happens with Normalize but you can use that to your advantage to selectively boost or reduce selected loud or quiet segments.

Post-processing - noise reduction (if needed)

Select a several second sample of just the noise you want to remove.

Post-processing - low pass / high pass and other ways to reduce echo?

What to do if the original recording has transient audio peaks (annoying clicks, chirps, squeaks etc)?
The following has worked for me.
Apply the low pass filter at as low a cut-off level as you can get away with e.g. 1,100 Hz, 12 dB roll-off
Then apply click removal (200/40)

Another alternative is to apply the RIAA filter using the Filter Curve EQ effect. This shifts the vocal emphasis towards the bass without over-muffling the sound. Reducing the intensity of the higher frequencies allows the listener to focus on the mid-low vocal range and deemphasises the intensity of any annoying high-end audio reflection that gets captured so easily when using a condensor mic in a room without sound treatment.

Then EQ->Normalize->Compressor->Normalize (can repeat if needed) as follows...

1. Post-processing - Graphic EQ (equalization)

Base boost plust treble boost

2. Post-processing - Normalize

Apply default (-3dB) - the waveform will push over 0.5 but keep away from 1.0

3. Post-processing - Compressor

Select -19 dB or choose a threshold between default -12dB down to as low as -30dB 
Select noise floor, around -50dB
Select ratio 4.7:1 or vary, typical ratio, between 2:1 - 3:1 - 5:1
Drop attack time (0.2s) and release time (2.0s) to maximise compression applied

These settings end up boosting the volume (visually the waveform moves closer to 1.0) making it too loud and noisy so you'll need to normalize (or amplify) again...

4. Post-processing - Normalize (again)

Apply default (-3dB) or you can apply Amplify -3dB, for the same result. 
The desired result being for the waveform peaks to re-balance back to around the 0.5 level.

Improving a Zoom track?

Loudness Normalization > AUMatrixReverb > ClipFix > Normalize 3 > Amplify 3
Apply Noise Reduction if a suitable noise sample is available
Apply De-Esser and De-Clicker if needed
Overall, peak levels to be no more than 3dB

AUMatrixReverb settings may help to obscure small room reverb

Alternatively or in addition you might get some improvement by applying the AUBandpass Filter 

AUBandpass Filter



Finish up

Export the mp3

Finally, create the finished product, by exporting to an mp3 file. 
> File > Export > Export as MP3
This mixes all tracks in the Audacity project down to a single track. 
Use settings similar to the following to export your audio file.







Quality checks:

  • Is the intro/outro music at a suitable level?
  • Does the intro/outro transition smoothly to/from the spoken audio?
  • Is the spoken audio at a suitable level? (i.e. no clipping, waveform amplitude averages around 0.5 on linear scale)
  • Is the speed of speech natural?
  • Large scale edit - remove fumbled speech, removed confidential disclosures, cut out a duplicate or passages that were off topic, etc.
  • Small scale edit - remove ticks, emms, ahhs, sighs, distracting background, etc.
  • You wouldn't normally have backing music running throughout a podcast, but in some cases, for example, background room noises leaking into the audio, so you may decide to use low volume background as a filler/distractor.

Useful links

An Audacity tutorial on mixing a narration with background music
https://manual.audacityteam.org/man/tutorial_mixing_a_narration_with_background_music.html

Refer to the Audacity manual online (e.g. the track panel description/explanation is at manual.audacityteam.org)

An Audacity user's simple tutorial and workflow activities:

Using the Compressor in Audacity

Using Noise Removal in Audacity

On including music from other artists (for atmosphere, decoratively, for intros/outros & transitions)

In the first instance, if you know the artist ask for their permission to use their material. You may be pleasantly surprised by the positive cycle of recognition and community surrounding artist works. Make sure you acknowledge them in your show notes.

We recommend releasing under the “Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike version 4.0  creative commons licence (aka CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). You can choose from a number or variations of the CC licence; CC BY, CC BY-NC, CC SA etc.
These licences can be viewed at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Always check the royalty free claims of audio samples found online. If you want to find audio from online sources, search for CC BY titles on Soundcloud or on YouTube
The link to the YouTube channel  "Of Musicians" below is a collection of a selection of royalty free original music.

Record the following information in your show notes to establish the provenance and bona fides of 3rd party music, artwork and creative content that you decide to use:

Music (CC BY-NC-SA licence) 
Title: “a title”
Artist: “a name”
Source: “a link to the original”
Licence: “CC BY-NC-SA”

Cover Art (CC BY-NC-SA licence)
Title: “a title”
Artist: “a name”
Source: “a link to the original”
Licence: “CC BY-NC-SA”

Example workflows:

Note, don't just apply these without testing. The basic method is to select a 10s sample and preview effects/filters until you are happy with the sound.

Simple standard process
Align tracks
Per-track noise reduction
Isolate voices
De-clicker (default) on all tracks (process run-time is typically the full track duration e.g. 15-30+ minutes)
De-esser (default) on all tracks (process run-time is a small fraction of the track duration)
Loudness Normalization (-23dB LUFS)
Compressor (default)
Makeup soft and suppress clipping on small edits with Normalize.

For an original track that had a pronounced small 'room' sound and a tendency to 'clipping zone' raw i.e. the waveform looks high, square and flat.
Align and isolate
De-clicker (default) on all tracks (process run-time is typically the full track duration e.g. 15-30+ minutes)
De-esser (default) on all tracks (process run-time is a small fraction of the track duration)
Loudness Normalization (-23dB LUFS)
Compressor (default)
Loudness Normalization (-23dB LUFS) (again)
Makeup soft and suppress clipping on small edits with Normalize.
AUMultiBandCompressor on affected track (the Sub Control preset sounded nice)
Normalize all audio to push up/down to average 0.5 waveform view (to give a typical -12dB to -6dB range with -3dB peaks)

For a track with clicks and speech that sounds very wet.
De-clicker (non-default 2 pass or more) on wet track.

Isolating second voice when two mics in the same room
Switch to Spectrogram view and select vocal patches with "Spectral edit multi tool" to fade-edit cross-talk.
AUMultiBandCompressor on affected track (the Sub Control preset sounds nice)

For a track with small room reverb and 'tinny' mic
Switch to Spectrogram view and select low frequencies 1-300Hz with "Spectral edit multi tool" to fade-edit.
Apply Filter Curve EQ - apply 100Hz Rumble filter to remove 'rumble pressure' from the audio (it feels like pressing on your ears when listening with headphones).
Apply Filter Curve EQ - apply Radio filter to remove the sensation of light 'highs' pressure when listening to the audio.

Wednesday, February 7, 2024

Statista as a data source...

Note, I generally do not approve of the use of Statista as a data source. Statista is a data aggregator, not a primary source. It may be useful for identifying useful original sources but I do not regard it as an original source. 

To check if UCD has campus access (Campus License International).
Click on Login and select Campus Access, you then select "University College Dublin" from the box <Select your University>. Statista then logs you in automatically.

<from Statista's website>
On Campus
When you are on campus, and within the university network, https://www.statista.com/ will be available through an automated IP-activation which requires no further logging in.
Off Campus
If you want to have access to Statista off campus, from home, or a cafe, you can use Shibboleth Access or EZ Proxy. 
Use the dropdown box to check if your campus has Shibboleth Access:

DataCamp Projects

Complete the following learning goal "Introduction to DataCamp Projects".
This short introduction to DataCamp projects introduces you to Jupyter Notebooks. Notebooks are widely used and are a really handy way of playing with data, for organising and presenting research.

If you cannot find this activity, navigate via "Learn" > Projects > Introduction to DataCamp Projects (screenshot below).

Navigate to "Introduction to DataCamp Projects"




Monday, February 5, 2024

Group podcast activity

Group podcast activity

Sign-up to the "Peer Group Code of Conduct" (copies distributed in-class). You can also use this to record participation as needed.

The basics

To host a 20-40 minute podcast you will need to:

  1. Identify a guest to interview for the pod.
  2. Agree the scope: 6 questions.
  3. Arrange a date and time for the recording.
  4. Host and capture the recording.
  5. Edit and finish for the pod.
  6. Custom cover art, show notes (description), and announcement text.
  7. Polish the finished product and publish.

Note: Cover art requirement: "Podcast feeds contain artwork that is a minimum size of 1400 x 1400 pixels and a maximum size of 3000 x 3000 pixels, 72 dpi, in JPEG or PNG format with appropriate file extensions (.jpg, .png), and in the RGB colorspace. Aim not to exceed ~300KB size file."

In this example of a podcast cover-art file I deliberately included the dotted line as part of the art.

The live podcast format

Develop your own running order / show notes. The order of questions (and indicated responses) are merely a starting point. Include links to other material you might have referenced in the show or to point to additional content. Don't forget that the show notes will include acknowledgement for the music, images, clip art etc. (creator name url copyright/license).

The show notes / running order is merely a guide rather than a tight script and the show itself always takes its own course. Avoid reading word-for-word scripted responses - unless you have amazing voice acting skills it is nearly impossible to not to sound wooden. However the activity of preparing primes and enables you to engage nimbly with the flow of a discussion.

Your show-notes can be used to share links to online versions of visual elements, references to other material etc. For the final edited podcast, assume your audience is only able to listen to the audio file.


More tips:

What does the finished product look like?
Find inspiration in some of our other episodes on the Design Talk (dot IE) podcast.
Prep and activities:
Read, amend and sign the "Peer Group Code of Conduct" when your group is formed.
You should identify a guest to invite (let me know if you have ideas) but if you can't find a guest I'll help you to source one.
Arrange and coordinate the date/time and venue.
Up to two co-hosts assigned for the interview (review previous episodes to get a sense of the format).
Everyone to keep track of time, to prompt and track engagement during the conversation and to highlight comments or themes that arise on the group chat.
Each member to create their own edit, to edit the mp3 file down to a compact lively podcast with intro/outro etc. using Audacity.
Each member to create a podcast cover art version for the episode.

Tuesday, January 23, 2024

Research based Term Paper

THE RESEARCH PROJECT - GUIDELINES

Video + Term Paper + Reflection

1. Goal - Scope

Researching a single country, state, or region; the working title will be:
Understanding the relationship between the local and global digital economy and its social impact in [country/region]. 

2. Deliverables: Term-paper plus video presentation

Term-paper: Paper May Not Exceed Ten Pages Including References. A 1-page Personal Learning Reflection must be included as an appendix. Appendices are not included in the page count limit.
Video presentation: The video presentation can give a concise overview of the subject matter and impact of your term-paper in a short video format (4-minute duration).
You are expected to create your own original narration and/or spoken audio content, similarly you should utilise as much of your own visual/graphical material as possible. You can of course utilise various elements sourced elsewhere (subject to licence) as background or linking pieces, e.g. diagrams, music etc. if needed as content or for artistic balance. Grade deduction if the presentation/video has text-to-speech narration or uses 'canned animation.' While not being graded separately from the term-paper, no video results in losing half the available mark for the research project.

3. Starting the research project...

  • Interpret the working title? 
  • Phrase the statement as a question and consider how to answer the question.
  • Write a short literature review to critique aspects of the history, situation, processes etc of a particular sourcing context. 
Can you find primary/secondary economic/social data in the following broad categories?
  • a) Services Sector in general but particularly ICT, ITO and BPO activity (any/all if possible) within the country over time. (aggregate data). For some countries you may only be able to gather aggregate services import/export data and that is fine. The limitation won't be your fault. However you will discover that some countries do provide detailed breakdowns at the level of BPO, ITO, ICT as services or product exports or both (refer to the examples of the previous student projects for inspiration).
  • b) The relative measures of social good and humanitarian values (your choice, e.g. educational attainment, educational participation, unemployment rates etc.), within the country over time. (aggregate data). The measures of societal impact should be relevant to your country's case context; for example it is probably not relevant to consider life expectancy in a mature developed country like the UK, however employment/unemployment, educational attainment etc. is likely to be highly relevant.
  • Impact Sourcing: You may consider expanding your research, perhaps contact actors in the field, conduct interviews or other modes for gathering empirical data. More involved research questioning would depend on the kind of access you gain and the types of evidence you find. Extending your scope might include some or all of the following:
    • What (if any) actual social enterprises (or businesses with an overriding social mission) are there and how are they doing? Social enterprises of most interest (although you might relax the criteria just to get evidence) in this instance would be those in which locals provide service/products -- ideally digital and or digitally mediated -- to distant clients.
    •  Researching the wider financial welfare effect of having any kind of local business, even the effects of individuals, sole traders' business activity through involvement in microsourcing for example. The welfare effect is the economics term for eventual outcomes of profit accumulation. It assumes profits will filter back into the economy, may also be construed negatively, that social costs of unethical business may be carried by the wider community.
  • There may be evidence of impact in terms of what might be called social capital, civic community activity etc. This could be the kind of social cohesion that Robert Putnam talks about.
  • Find trustworthy accessible primary and secondary data sources addressing questions like:
    • What portion of the country/region activity is traded globally? 
    • How is/are globally traded services activity measured? 
    • Is ICT sector evident in traded services measures in this country/region? 
    • Has the level of educational attainment changed over time? 
    • Can you track digital industry and entrepreneurial activity over time?
    • Is activity in local digital-rich industries increasing?
    • Can you find primary/secondary data on educational participation, attainment etc. and workplace activity, participation, salary growth etc.? 
    • Is FDI (foreign direct investment) data available?
    • Is FDI related to digital-entrepreneurial activity? 
    • Is FDI associated with educational attainment? 

4. General points on writing...

This term paper is written in an academic style, presenting background reading, research methods, research, analysis, theorising etc.
  
You must use the scientific conference template for the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS - being held in Paphos, Cyprus - https://ecis2024.eu/). Choose between either the LaTeX or Word template - copies of both are available on Google Drive, links below.
Most important! Please ensure that any direct use of 3rd party material (particularly internal documentation) is presented within quotation marks or boxed or otherwise marked in some way and with the appropriate citation/identification.

A small number of selected figures/graphs to support analysis may be included in the body text. However more extensive figures/graphs can be included in the appendix (no page count limit within reason). 

If you deem it necessary, provide only a limited number of indicative samples of original source data tables in the text. You can include more extensive tables in the appendix if needed. However unless they are a concise format, do not include full copies of large data sets in the appendix. We will assume that you have stored copies in your private working folder that could be inspected (in theory) if required.

5. Structure of a typical journal style paper - not all sections may be needed

Title
The title and abstract should both capture the essence of the study.
Abstract 
Introduction / Literature (positioning)
Give a brief introduction to the literature and positioning for the study.
Research Design / Methods / Context
Outline your research design, and method.
Data / Findings
Tell the story, provide the evidence, findings, account or narrative.
Analysis / Discussion
Analysis and discussion allow you to draw out the significance of what you have discovered. This is where you can apply/trial various analytical models or produce your own interpretation of the data, in order to better understand the evidence.
Conclusions
Conclusions summarise the findings concisely, often in a page. This is a overall synthesis distilling your analysis and its relevance to theory and the literature.
Bibliography/References
The bibliography/reference section is crucial to get right as it is the index to prior research and literature that you have referred to previously.
Appendices (if needed)
Use appendices to provide additional detail if necessary. Usually data samples, or intermediate representations, for example a sample of the data analysis process, coding frames, stages in the coding and summary or intermediate categories from data.

6. Grading

Grading will consider the following criteria:
  1. The research project is clearly explained.
  2. Critical positioning in literature.
  3. Empirical work, data and evidence presented.
  4. Overall quality of the document as a finished product.
  5. Contributions are clear.

A brief explanation of letter grade descriptors is provided below.

Modular (letter) grades.

A+/A
  • The report is suitable for submitting to conference, journal, or executive with little revision.
  • There is a compelling logic to the report that reveals clear insight and understanding of the issues.
  • Analytical techniques used are appropriate and correctly deployed.
  • The analysis is convincing, complete and enables creative insight.
  • The report is written in a clear, lucid, thoughtful and integrated manner-with complete grammatical accuracy and appropriate transitions.
  • The report is complete and covers all important topics.
  • Appropriate significance is attached to the information presented.
  • Research gathered is summarised in some way, research and analytical methods described and discussed, evidence linked to argument and conclusions.
A-/B+
  • The report may be suitable for submitting to conference, journal, or executive if sections are revised and improved.
  • There is a clear logic to the report that reveals insight.
  • Analytical techniques used are appropriate and correctly deployed.
  • The analysis is convincing, complete and enables clear insight.
  • The report is written in a clear, lucid, and thoughtful manner-with a high degree of grammatical accuracy.
  • The report is complete and covers all important topics.
  • Appropriate significance is attached to the information presented.
B/B-
  • The report may be suitable as a discussion draft for further development or refinement.
  • There is a clear logic to the report.
  • Analytical techniques are deployed appropriately.
  • The analysis is clear and the authors draw clear, but not comprehensive conclusions for their analyses.
  • The report is written in a clear, lucid and thoughtful manner, with a good degree of grammatical accuracy.
  • The report is substantially complete, but an important aspect of the topic is not addressed.
  • The report may have used or presented some information in a way that was inappropriate. 
C
  • The report may be suitable as a preliminary draft but needs substantial revision in a number of areas to develop further.
  • The basic structure of the report is well organised but may need rebalancing.
  • The content of the report may be partial, incomplete or unfinished with important aspects not addressed.
  • The report used information that was substantially irrelevant, inappropriate or inappropriately deployed.
  • The report’s analysis is incomplete and authors fail to draw relevant conclusions.
  • The report may contain many errors in expression, grammar, spelling.
D/E
  • The report may appear to be preliminary, speculative, and/or substantially incomplete.
  • Whatever information provided is used inappropriately.
  • The structure of the report may be inappropriate or need substantial reorganisation and/or rebalancing.
  • There may be little analysis, evidence may not be founded, the findings may be inconclusive.
  • The report appears to frequently use information that is substantially irrelevant, inappropriate or inappropriately deployed.
  • The report may be poorly written, organised and presented.
  • Frequent errors of grammatical expression.

7. Personal Reflection

(included as a 1 page section in the appendix.)

The aim of a personal reflection is to give the student an opportunity to relate a personal understanding of the course. To highlight not just the described learning outcomes but also draw attention to challenges and areas of difficulty. Think of it as a statement of what you determine to be the key learnings and contribution of the course. It can be critical, highlighting gaps etc. Ultimately it is a personal statement of your own (perhaps new or changed) perspective on the subject, new understandings, difficulties, and insights.

Grading criteria:

The Personal Reflection is authentic, critical, supported by evidence and descriptive, conveying your own personal learning insights.
  • A single page, approximately 500 words.
  • Is it original? Is it your own work? (this is a basic requirement)
  • Are the insights and learning described authentic? Does it honestly communicate your personal learning on taking this class?
  • Is it critical? Critique isn't a bad thing. It challenges your own and others, even the subject itself. Consider prior understandings, misunderstanding, new knowledge, or changes in understanding?
  • Are statements supported with examples? For example, comments or reflections on the homework tasks, the project, themes and subject matter?
  • Core concepts? At the very best the reflection offers a compelling account of the significance of some of the key ideas arising in the course.

Monday, January 22, 2024

This class is supported by DataCamp

datacamp: clear as data



We think DataCamp is the best platform for self-paced learning for data science skills development.
DataCamp is the most intuitive learning platform for data science and analytics. Learn any time, anywhere and become an expert in R, Python, SQL, and more. DataCamp’s learn-by-doing methodology combines short expert videos and hands-on-the-keyboard exercises to help learners retain knowledge. DataCamp offers 350+ courses by expert instructors on topics such as importing data, data visualization, and machine learning. They’re constantly expanding their curriculum to keep up with the latest technology trends and to provide the best learning experience for all skill levels. Join over 6 million learners around the world and close your skills gap.

The value of using DataCamp

The DataCamp skills self-paced training is directly relevant to digital and business in general. Employers recognise and highly value even basic python, R, Excel or general data science skills. Everyone's paths will be different and DataCamp supports different learning needs, offering support and challenges suited to both beginner and experienced learners. More importantly the data analytical tools are directly relevant to your term paper project, whether you use python, R or Excel, ultimately the DataCamp courses will help. Some projects in DataCamp may align well with your own research projects.
An introductory pathway for new starters and programming rebooters.
  • The Excel Fundamentals track
  • The R Programming Fundamentals track
  • and many others.
Consider following one of the many guided or unguided DataCamp projects by browsing through the catalogue. For example:
  • https://learn.datacamp.com/projects
A relevant example (using R) is "Visualizing Inequalities in Life Expectancy"&nbsp;
  • https://learn.datacamp.com/projects/166

Some thoughts on learning using DataCamp

Taking the DataCamp learning tracks early and taking them seriously is important. The knowledge and learning you will gain will stand to you in your career, although you may never end up coding for work you will have acquired a deep appreciation for the work itself and an understanding of the concerns of the people who do and who you will interact with or manage.

"You will inevitably encounter specific learning challenges in different tracks. The programming courses (like computer programming in general) will pose challenges of syntax, logic, even spelling. Yes, coding can be extremely frustrating for us all, regardless of experience. That is why we also offer in-person tutorials. We believe that self-directed learning still needs an element of interaction with others to succeed, to help problem solve, to overcome roadblocks. We have all encountered education models where information is presented pre-configured, where the answers are provided in plain view, merely requiring extraction and mapping to solve problems, or regurgitating at the right moment of a multiple choice question. But if you find yourself stuck on a problem and unable to make progress based on the instructions. What then? The educators in DataCamp, while providing lots of scaffolding and spoon-fed problems, actually encourage, and in many cases require, the learner to go off and explore other related content and solve problems using external resources. Using "search", drawing upon and participating in online communities such as StackExchange and other sources is both appropriate and commended. Not for copy-and-paste-code, but for phrasing the problem, following dialogue, engaging in conversation. Over time you will find yourself emboldened to take an active part in these communities, supporting others as they struggle problems like those you eventually overcame."